Introduction
Rubrics used to evaluate research-based dissertation most often rate each section or chapter as well as the overall document. The section ratings may be holistic or broken down into components. There are examples of rubrics for the proposal and the final dissertation, as well as for the oral defense. These rubrics focus on many of the same dimensions used to rate papers (e.g., organization, thoroughness, mechanics, format).
Rubrics for Written Assignments
Lovitts (2005) argued that faculty have implicit standards for evaluating dissertations and that making them explicit in a rubric makes evaluation of dissertations more valid, reliable, and consistent. In a study of faculty members in a sample of universities and disciplines, she asked participants to characterize dissertations and their components (i.e., problem statement, literature review, theory, methods, analysis, and discussion) at four levels of quality (i.e., Outstanding, Very Good, Acceptable, and Unacceptable).
Criteria
Based on her data, she developed a table of the characteristics of dissertations of differing quality. For example, outstanding dissertations were described as
- Original, significant, compelling, creative, engaging, interesting, and thoughtful
- Very well written and organized
- Synthesizing information and connecting components seamlessly
- Exhibiting mature, independent thinking
- Having a point of view and authoritative voice
- Asking a new question or addressing an important problem
- Displaying deep understanding of massive amount of complicated literature
- Making focused, logical, rigorous, and sustained argument
- Theoretically sophisticated
- Using or developing new tools, methods, approaches, or types of analyses
- Having rich data
- Using analysis that is comprehensive, complete, and convincing
- Showing significant results
- Creating a conclusion that ties the whole thing together
- Of interest to a larger community
On the other hand, unacceptable dissertations were described as
- Poorly written, having grammatical and spelling errors,
- Having a sloppy presentation
- Plagiarized or deliberately misread or misused sources
- Lacking in understanding of basic concepts, processes, or conventions of discipline
- Lacking careful thought
- Looking at a problem that is trivial, weak, unoriginal, or already solved
- Misunderstanding or missing relevant literature
- Making a weak, inconsistent, self-contradictory, unconvincing, or invalid argument
- Not handling theory well, neglecting theory, or missing theory
- Relying on inappropriate of incorrect methods
- Presenting data that are flawed, wrong, false, or misrepresented
- Using wrong, inappropriate, incoherent, or confused analysis
- Including results that are obvious, already known, unexplained, or misinterpreted
- Having unsupported or exaggerated interpretation
- Failing to make a contribution
These descriptions could be used as a basis for a rubric to rate dissertations. Lovitts concluded that such a rubric could be used as a teaching tool during the dissertation process. Distributing it to students would set clear expectations at the outset and filling it out periodically would allow the advisor and student to evaluate progress and areas for improvement. Thus, the rubric can be a tool for faculty to provide feedback and establish benchmarks against which students can subsequently evaluate their own work. It can also be used in peer review, with students evaluating the work of their peers to provide an additional source of feedback.
How to Grade a Dissertation
These are example of dissertation-related rubrics developed by Alliant schools and programs.
ELM and Ed Psych CSOE dissertation
Examples of Rubrics for Rating Dissertation Proposals
Rubrics for Assessing Dissertations
Texas A&M/Commerce Thesis and Dissertation Services
Dissertation Proposal Rubric
Syracuse University Graduate School of Education
Thesis/Dissertation Proposal Rubric
Fresno State Academics
Examples of Rubrics for Rating Dissertations
Rubric for Evaluating Dissertations
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology
Dissertation Rubric
California State University/Northridge Michael D. Eisner School of Education
Rubrics for Assessing Dissertations
Texas A&M University/Commerce Graduate School
Examples of Rubrics for Rating Oral Defense
Assessment Rubric for Defense of Dissertation
University of Maryland
Presentation Rubric for Evaluating MS Thesis & PhD Dissertation Defenses
University of Miami Department of Public Health Sciences
Dissertation defense rubric
Loyola University School of Medicine
University of Rhode Island Graduate Council
Thesis/Dissertation Defense Evaluation